National Institute of Polar Research, Kaga 1-9-10, Itabashi, Tokyo
173-8515, Japan.
mailto:kaoru@nipr.ac.jp
Northwest Research Associates, P.O.Box 3027, Bellevue, WA 98009,
U.S.A.
mailto:tim@nwra.com
FIGURES
Abstract
1. Introduction
Radiosonde observations of temperature and horizontal winds have
been made at many stations in the world operationally over decades
mostly for the purpose of weather prediction. Horizontal wind
and temperature data obtained from operational high-resolution
radiosonde observation in Japan have recently been available.
By analyzing the data over 4 years at all 18 stations, it is discovered
that clearly layered and long lasting structure in horizontal
winds appears frequently in winter at several stations simultaneously.
In this study, appearance patterns and sources of the layered
disturbances are also examined by EOF analysis and backward trajectory
analysis, respectively.
2. Existence of the layered disturbances
A typical example of the layered disturbances is shown in Figure
1. Figure 1a shows original (i.e. unfiltered) meridional wind
$v$ at Naha located in the south part of Japan. Strong and shallow
northward winds are observed below the upper tropopause continuously
from 25 December to 10 January. To see the layered structure of
meridional winds more clearly, we extracted fluctuations using
a bandpass filter in the vertical with cutoff lengths of 1.5 and
6 km and a lowpass filter in time with a cutoff length of 2 days,
which hereafter we refer to as $v'$ component. Similar disturbances
are seen simultaneously at other stations of Ishigakijima (Figure
1c) and Chichijima (Figure 1d).
Figure 1. Time-height sections for the time period of December 20, 1995
to January 10, 1996 of (a) $v$ at Naha (26.2N, 127.7E, station
No. 47936), (b) $v'$ at Naha, (c) $v'$ at Ishigakijima (24.3N,
124.2E, 47918), and (d) $v'$ at Chichijima (27.1N, 142.2E, 47971).
Contour intervals are 5{\ms} ($\cdots$, -10, -5, 0, 5, 10, $\cdots$)
for (a) and {\ms} ($\cdots$, -5, -3, -1, 1, 3, $\cdots$) for (b),
(c), and (d). Thick contours show 0{\ms} for (a). Dots indicate
the tropopause levels.
Such layered disturbances frequently appear at many stations mostly
in winter. Thus, further examination is made for winter periods
from 1 December through 10 March in each year. The total number
of analyzed vertical profiles is 802 at each station. It should
be noted that such small vertical-scale atmospheric disturbances
have been analyzed mostly in terms of gravity waves so far. However,
it may be needed to consider another possibility of inertial instability
particularly for small-scale disturbances in low latitude regions.
3. EOF analysis
To examine appearance pattern of the layered disturbances, we
made an EOF analysis of time series of $v'$ amplitude averaged
in the dominant height region of 8-16km. The result suggests that
there are two dominant principal components. Figure 2 shows the
two dominant EOF components. The first component (EOF1) is characterized
as disturbances dominant at stations in the middle of Japan (30-37N,
referred to as EOF1 stations), and the second one (EOF2) is as
at stations in the south of Japan (23-30N, referred to as EOF2
stations). The time series of each EOF component has quite high
correlation (greater than 0.7) with $v'$ amplitude time series
at stations with high score, indicating that EOF1 and EOF2 modes
describe well the appearance of the disturbances at EOF1 and EOF2
stations, respectively.
Figure 2. A pattern of (a) EOF1 and (2) EOF2 components. Positive and negative
values are indicated by closed and open circles, respectively.
The diameter of the circles is proportional to EOF values.
Using both radiosonde data and NCEP reanalysis data, the background
field preferred by the layered disturbances was examined. For
convenience, cases with values of EOF1 time series are greater
(less) than its standard deviation are referred to as positive
(negative) EOF1 cases. Similarly positive and negative EOF2 cases
are defined. Figure 3 shows composite of meridional cross sections
along a longitude of 135E for positive EOF1 and EOF2 cases. One
of the most interesting results is that EOF2 disturbances are
dominant when and where the background potential vorticity (PV)
is quite small. This suggests that EOF2 disturbances are due to
inertial instability.
Figure 3. Composite of meridional cross sections along a longitude of 135E
of zonal (U) and meridional winds(V), potential vorticity (PV)
and (d) angular momentum (AM:black contours) and potential temperature
($\theta$: red contours) from top to bottom for positive EOF1
(left) and positive EOF2 cases (right). Contour intervals are
10{\ms} for U, 5{\ms} for V, and 0.1$\times$10$^{-9}$m$^2$s$^{-1}$
for AM. Units for $\theta$ are K. Contour intervals for PV are
0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3, 6, 12, 25, 50, and 100PVU
(PVU$\equiv$10$^{-6}$Km$^2$kg$^{-1}$s$^{-1}$). The regions with
PV values smaller than 0.1PVU (greater than 1.6PVU) are colored
by blue (green).
To examine the frequency of inertial instability, the percentage
of time periods with negative PV values is calculated at each
grid point on the 345K surface where layered disturbances are
dominant for winter periods. The result is shown in Figure 4.
Surprisingly, the frequency of negative potential vorticity is
higher than 30 % in the zonally elongated region at 23-29N in
the western Pacific on 345K surface (an about 10km altitude).
This region corresponds to the locations of EOF2 stations. It
is interesting that such a high frequency of negative potential
vorticity is not observed at other longitudes in this latitude
region.
Figure 4. A contour map of the percentage of times when potential vorticity
is negative at each grid point in winter periods on an isentropic
surface of 345K. Contour intervals are 10%. The regions with percentages
greater than 20% are shaded. The region with larger percentage
is more darkly shaded.
4. Backward trajectory analysis
To see the origin of this anomalous potential vorticity, we made
a backward trajectory analysis. Six hourly NCEP reanalysis data
are used to make integration backward in time for 7 days with
a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme. The time step is taken to be
1 h. The backward trajectories are calculated for each station
as a starting location every 6 hours for the whole winter periods.
The total number of trajectories is amount to 1464 for each station.
Figure 5 is a typical example of positive EOF2 case. The negative
potential vorticity air for EOF2 disturbances can be traced back
to the equatorial region south of Japan within 3 days. This is
due to a strong northward blanch of Hadley circulation associated
with strong convection on the Maritime continent.
Figure 5. (a) Backward trajectories starting at EOF2 stations at 00Z 27
December, 1995. The distance between dots in each trajectory corresponds
to 1 day. (b) A contour map of Montgomery stream function at 00Z
27 December, 1995. Contour intervals are 10$^3$ m$^2$s$^{-2}$.
Dashed curves are the contours of 340.5$\times$10$^3$m$^2$s$^{-2}$.
Darkly (lightly) shaded are the region with negative potential
vorticity (smaller than 0.1PVU). The stratospheric regions (i.e.
PV$>$1.6PVU) are hatched.
On the other hand, the background potential vorticity is low but
not negative for EOF1 disturbances (Figure 6). Air parcels reaching
EOF1 stations are traced back to far west because of the existence
of strong westerly jet. Thus, it is inferred that the EOF1 disturbances
are due to inertial gravity waves trapped in a duct of the westerly
jet core.
Figure 6. As in Figure 5 but for the time periods starting at 00Z 10 February,
1997.
Using all trajectories for the whole winter periods starting at
each station, the number of trajectories getting to each grid
point is calculated for each time lag (Figure 7). Contours show
the same number (10) of trajectories for each radiosonde station.
Line types of the contours are changed according to the EOF groups:
black thick contours are for EOF2 stations, gray thick contours
are for EOF1 stations, and thin contours are for remaining stations
in the north part of Japan. It is seen that the trajectories are
clearly divided into the EOF groups. Air parcels at EOF1 stations
are traced back to farther west, which is likely due to the existence
of strong westerly jet. Air parcels at EOF2 stations have different
trajectories. Those are distributed southwest of Japan on Day
-1, the distribution is elongated zonally on Day -3, and the distribution
is spread more zonally in the equatorial region on Day -5. This
fact supports the results of EOF analysis that EOF1 and EOF2 disturbances
occur independently.
Figure 7. Contours indicating the region where the number of backward
trajectories is 10, for day (a) -1, (b) -3, (c) -5., and (d) -7
starting at every radiosonde station in Japan.
5. Summary
By analyzing operational high-resolution radiosonde data in Japan
over 4 years, it is revealed that long-lasting layered wind disturbances
appear frequently in winter at several stations simultaneously.
The dominant height region is 8-16km. The result of an EOF analysis
indicates that there are two dominant modes for their appearance.
The first component (EOF1) is dominant in the middle of Japan
(30-37N), and the second (EOF2) dominant in the south of Japan
(23-30N). The background fields for the layered disturbances are
examined using NCEP reanalysis data. The background potential
vorticity is frequently negative when and where EOF2 disturbances
are dominant, suggesting that the EOF2 disturbances are due to
inertial instability. The negative potential vorticity air for
EOF2 disturbances can be traced back to the equatorial region
within a few days. On the other hand, the background potential
vorticity around EOF1 disturbances is low but scarcely negative.
Air parcels at EOF1 stations are traced back to far west because
of the existence of strong eastward jet stream. Thus, it is inferred
that the EOF1 disturbances are due to inertia-gravity waves trapped
in a duct of the westerly jet core.
This paper was submitted to J. Atmos. Sci.
K. Sato and T. J. Dunkerton, 2000: Layered structure associated
with low potential vorticity in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere revealed by high-resolution radiosonde observation
data in Japan.
Back to
Session 1 : Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate | Session 2 : Stratospheric Indicators of Climate Change |
Session 3 : Modelling and Diagnosis of Stratospheric Effects on Climate | Session 4 : UV Observations and Modelling |
AuthorData | |
Home Page |