Response of the MA-ECHAM/CHEM model to solar forcing: first results of a fully interactive model study

K. Tourpali(1), R. van Dorland(2), C. J. E. Schuurmans(1)

(1) Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht(IMAU), The Netherlands
(2) Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, The Netherlands

B. Steil, C. Bruehl

Max-Plank-Institute fur Chemie, Mainz, Germany


FIGURES


Abstract

The extent to which solar activity is a factor in climatic change is still a matter of debate. In this study the response of ozone and tropopause pressure to solar UV radiation changes in combination to variations of the solar constant resulting from the 11 - year solar cycle is investigated using the global three-dimensional dynamic-chemical model MA-ECHAM4/CHEM. The general circulation model (MA-ECHAM4), an extended upward version of ECHAM4 with the top at 0.01 hPa, has been interactively coupled to the tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry module CHEM. The coupled model employs interactive photochemistry and includes heterogeneous reactions on PSCs and sulphate aerosols. Preliminary results on ozone distribution changes due to the 11-year solar cycle are presented, along with zonal tropopause pressure changes, resulting from the interactive stratospheric ozone, radiation and dynamics changes as depicted in the model.

1. Model description

MA-ECHAM/CHEM is a spectral General Circulation Model with interactive chemistry from surface to a height of about 80 Km, based on the 'Middle Atmosphere version of the European Centre model in HAMburg' (Roeckner et al, 1996). The horizontal resolution is T30, with 39 vertical layers (top at 0.01 hPa) and time step set to 15 minutes. The model incorporates the parameterisation of gravity wave effects from Manzini and McFarlane (1998) and uses the Spitfire advection scheme.

The chemistry module CHEM (Steil et al, 1998) contains chemical processes required to describe stratospheric ozone chemistry and tropospheric background chemistry. 18 species are transported individually or as families, and diagnostic methane oxidation is calculated. 110 photochemical reactions are taken into account, and the photolysis rates are calculated 'on-line' using the accurate and computationally effective scheme of Landgraf and Crutzen (1998) which also includes changes in clouds and ozone. The concentration of the long lived species is prescribed at the surface, while for the short lived species their emissions and dry deposition are prescribed also at the surface. At the top, only the NOx concentration is prescribed using observations from UARS/HALOE, varying with latitude, height and season. Heterogeneous reactions on Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) of type I and II and on sulphate aerosol are included. The model is fully interactive, i.e. changes in chemistry have a feedback into dynamics through their influence on radiation.


2. Experiment design

Our experiment aims at investigating the effects of enhanced solar UV radiation on climate. For this purpose, 2 separate runs of the model are being performed, lasting for 20 model years. The first model run represents conditions prevailing at the state of maximum solar activity during the sun's 11-year cycle, with enhanced solar irradiance mainly at the UV intervals, while the second run represents minimum solar activity conditions.

The basic state of the model, an 'average' state of the 11-year solar cycle, is a simulation of the present-day atmosphere, representing a time-slice for 1990, with carbon dioxide concentration set to 353 ppmv and chemical boundary conditions for 1990. The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) is fixed in the model, representing a 1974 -1994 climatology. The runs are performed from re-start files from a 60-year model run.

The solar fluxes in both perturbation runs were adjusted in the model's spectral intervals according to the difference between the solar minimum and solar maximum spectral solar flux changes (Lean et al., 1997). The changes are summarised in Table 1. Maximum solar activity is represented by enhanced solar flux distributed within the radiation scheme spectral intervals and enhanced solar flux distributed at the wavelength bands used for the photolysis rate calculations.


Table 1. Changes in Solar Flux


(* The number in parenthesis is the fixed wavelength at each spectral interval used in the photolysis rate calculation scheme. See Landgraf and Crutzen, 1998, for details)


3. Discussion

Our preliminary analysis here presents results from the first 5 and half years of the model runs. As our initial conditions from the re-start files represent late April conditions, the first 18 months of the model simulation are considered here as a spin up period for the model calculation and are therefore omitted from the analysis.

The first topic to consider is the changes in the ozone field, as solar induced changes in the chemical module of the model alter ozone production, and with the feedback from chemistry to the GCM's dynamics various chemical, radiative and subsequent dynamical processes are involved.

Figure 1 presents the changes in the ozone field between maximum and minimum solar activity conditions with respect to the 11-year solar cycle, as annual average of the last 3 years of the model simulation at each state of the model. The top panel shows the absolute changes in ozone mixing ratio (in ppmv), and the bottom panel shows the change in percent [100*(solar max - solar min)/ solar min)]. These changes, positive over all the stratosphere, with a maximum in absolute change in the area of ozone concentration maximum, are consistent with changes between solar maximum and solar minimum conditions as calculated by the Mainz 2D chemistry model (Bruehl, 1999). These preliminary results are also in reasonable agreement with observed changes (e.g. SPARC, 1999). Negative upper tropospheric changes mainly in the tropical region indicate that dynamics play an important role in modulating the ozone field in that region, changing the shape and possibly the intensity of the Hadley cell circulation, a result reported from earlier GCM simulations of the solar activity forcing, using prescribed ozone changes.




Figure 1 (see text)


The anomalies observed in the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere region of the model suggest that the tropopause region is influenced by solar flux changes and the subsequent ozone, radiation and dynamics changes. Recent results from observation analysis (Zerefos et al., 2000) show that the tropopause temperature is varying in accordance with the solar cycle, although recent volcanic eruptions may also play an important role. The volcanic eruptions happened to have occurred at the last two solar cycle maxima, and their effect in the lower stratospheric temperature is in synergy with the solar activity for the last two solar cycles. As our model does not include volcanic aerosol effect and SST changes, a direct comparison between model and observation results in tropopause pressure is extremely complicated.



Figure 2:Average annual tropopause pressure in years with solar maximum and solar minimum activity.

However, a preliminary result from our analysis, presented in Figure 2, shows a weak response in the tropical region, and a stronger response in the vicinity of about 30N, at the area of the descending branch of the Hadley cell, indicating a stretching of the northern branch of the cell during periods of maximum solar activity. The high response seen over the high latitude and polar regions, mainly in the northern hemisphere, could be subject to changes as more model years will be added to the analysis, due to high variability in these regions of the world.

4. References

Landgraf J. and P. J. Crutzen, An efficient method for 'on-line' calculations of photolysis and heating rates, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 863-878, 1998

Lean, J. G. J. Rottman, H. L. Kyle, T. N. Woods, J. R. Hickey, and L. C. Pugga, Detection and parameterisation of variations in solar mid-and-near-ultraviolet radiation (200-400nm), J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29939-29956, 1997

Manzini, E., and N. A. McFarlane, The effect of varying the source spectrum of a gravity wave parameterisation in a middle atmosphere general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31523-31539, 1998

Rroeckner, E., K. Arpe, L. Bengtsson, L. Christoph, M. Claussen, L. Dumenil, M. Esch, M. Giorgetta, U. Schlese, U. Schultzweida, The atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, Report 218, Max-Plank-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 1996

Steil B., M. Dameris, C. Bruehl, P. J. Crutzen, V. Grewe, M. Ponater and R. Sausen, Development of a chemistry module for GCMs: first results of a multi-annual integration, Annales Geophysicae, 16, 205-228, 1998

Zerefos, C. S., K. Tourpali, I. S. A. Isaksen, and C. J. E. Schuurmans, Long term solar induced variations in total ozone, stratospheric temperatures and the tropopause, Adv. In Space Res., 2000 (in press)


Back to

Session 1 : Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate Session 2 : Stratospheric Indicators of Climate Change
Session 3 : Modelling and Diagnosis of Stratospheric Effects on Climate Session 4 : UV Observations and Modelling
AuthorData
Home Page