Previous: References Up: Ext. Abst

List of figures

Figure 1. Annual cycle of the ozone profile parameters on individual stations.

Figure 2. Annual cycle of the ozone profile parameters on the northern hemisphere.

Figure 3. Ozone profiles used in experiments. Values in g/kg against pressure levels in hPa, empty circles for control profile, full circles for tropospheric increase by 200%, empty squares represent stratospheric reduction by 50% and full squares mean ozone profile based on TOMS data for 15^o E, 50^o N.

Figure 4. Solar heating rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 5. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (%).

Figure 6. Solar heating rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 7. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (%).

Figure 8. Ozone mass mixing ratio relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 9. Ozone mass mixing ratio relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 10. Solar heating rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 11. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 12. Solar heating rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 13. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 14. Cloud fractional cover difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run.

Figure 15. Cloud fractional cover difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run.

Figure 16. Cloud fractional cover difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run.

Figure 17. Cloud fractional cover difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run.

Figure 18. Long wave cooling rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 19. Long wave cooling rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 20. Long wave cooling rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 21. Long wave cooling rate difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (deg s^-1).

Figure 22. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (%).

Figure 23. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (%).

Figure 24. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 25. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 26. Detail of the greater negative impact of ozone profile based on monthly mean TOMS data on longwave heating rate. Relative difference (%) against control experiment, for 15^o E, 50^o N.

Figure 27. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 28. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 29. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 30. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 31. Long wave cooling flux of the surface in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 32. Long wave cooling flux of the surface in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 33. Solar flux absorbed in whole column of the atmosphere in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 34. Solar flux absorbed in whole column of the atmosphere in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 35. Net up flux at the top of the atmosphere in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 36. Net up flux at the top of the atmosphere in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 37. Total cloud fractional cover in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run.

Figure 38. Total cloud fractional cover in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run.

Figure 39. Surface air temperature difference in June 1994 sensitivity run with 200% increase of ozone in troposphere against the control run.

Figure 40. Surface air temperature difference in June 1994 sensitivity run with 50% decrease of ozone in stratosphere against the control run.

Figure 41. Surface air temperature difference in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run.

Figure 42. Surface air temperature difference in June 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS monthly mean of total ozone data against the control run.

Figure 43. Ozone mass mixing ratio relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in March 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 44. Ozone mass mixing ratio relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in October 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 45. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in March 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 46. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in March 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 47. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in March 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 48. Long wave cooling flux difference at the surface in March 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 49. Solar heating rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in October 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 50. Long wave cooling rate relative difference in the middle of model domain (for 15^o E, 50^o N) in October 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (%).

Figure 51. Surface absorbed solar flux difference in October 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Figure 52. Long wave cooling flux difference at the surface in October 1994 run with ozone profile reconstruction based on TOMS daily total ozone data against the control run (Wm²).

Previous: References Up: Ext. Abst